Federal judges say disputed North Carolina Supreme Court race belongs in state courts, for now
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that North Carolina's disputed race for a seat on the state Supreme Court must be reviewed in state courts before the matter can go before a federal tribunal.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on a case that will affect whether the FBI can be held accountable for accidentally ...
A federal judge who already questioned the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive ...
The U.S. Supreme Court's current term includes cases involving guns, gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday appointed two outside attorneys to defend the lower-court decisions in two cases in which the federal government has declined to do so. In a brief order on Tuesday ...
5hon MSN
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor was asked about sagging public confidence in the court. She answered by pointing ...
For the second year in a row, the Supreme Court docket is dominated by cases in which the federal government is a named party ...
2don MSN
The Supreme Court took more religious rights cases in recent years than it heard in the previous two decades. Is it eroding ...
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas slammed a circuit court of appeals for not adhering to legal precedent in a dissent ...
The justices recently agreed to review appeals that cite First Amendment religious rights. The high court’s decisions could ...
The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered that all cases related to results of the Common Law Admission Test 2025 for ...
President Trump’s Justice Department on Friday asked the Supreme Court to freeze four pending cases implicating the ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback