As Donald Trump targets law firms, some are fighting, some are striking deals, and some are pre-emptively caving before the White House even throws a punch.

Jones Day, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Sidley Austin and Kirkland & Ellis attorneys disclosed their shares and income in financial disclosures.

Big Law firms often lend expensive legal firepower to civil liberties organizations suing the government. Trump doesn't like that.

Every defendant has the right to a lawyer, and every lawyer has the right to pick whom they represent. Is this principle in danger?

Opinion: University of Washington's Eric Schnapper examines the divide growing between Big Law firms that choose to work with President Donald Trump versus resisting the EOs targeting lawyers—and what it means for the profession's future.

Law firms represent moneyed interests, so there is an inherent conflict here,” said Bill Henderson, a law professor at Indiana University. “They are in bed making a good living with these clients, and there are social consequences to that.

The president has attacked law firms for “frivolous” litigation. But his actions could undermine the basic right of Americans to sue their government.

Constitutional Showdown as Law Firms Respond to Executive Orders Targeting Their Clients, Hiring Practices, and Pro Bono Work In an unprecedented campaign against the legal profession, President Donald Trump has launched a sweeping offensive against major U.

The deal has similar conditions to Trump’s deal with Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. According to Trump’s Truth Social announcement, Milbank has agreed to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal services to causes that both Trump and Milbank support.