To recognize appeasement, it’s best to learn from a master. One must not mistake Neville Chamberlain for a Nazi. He wasn’t. His antisemitism was that of T. S. Eliot — an offended sensibility ...

There are echoes of the 1938 Munich Conference in President Trump’s handling of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, former CNU professor Mario D. Mazzarella, Ph.D., writes in a guest column.

Yet appeasement – what it constituted and when it was required – would be central to the decisions that both made. For Chamberlain, first Chancellor of the Exchequer and then Prime Minister, the ...

In September 1938, United Kingdom Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sealed his legacy as history’s exemplar of appeasement and the dangers it engenders. Adolf Hitler had massed hundreds of ...

Neville Chamberlain didn’t have the benefit of history to ... Mr. Casey deftly captures the eerie parallels between appeasement in the 1930s and the recent attempts to assuage Mr. Putin by many ...

This proposed appeasement is worse than that of Primer Minister Chamberlain in 1938. Three conditions existed back then that do not in the U.S. today. 1st, the U.K. needed two or three years to ...

His use of the term appeasement echoed the criticism of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who conceded Germany’s annexation of Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland in 1938 before World War II.

There are echoes of the 1938 Munich Conference in President Trump’s handling of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, former CNU professor Mario D. Mazzarella, Ph.D., writes in a guest column.