Mark Zuckerberg has blamed his long-time lieutenant Sheryl Sandberg for masterminding Facebook’s diversity projects as the billionaire seeks to repair ties with Donald Trump.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has had a busy few weeks. In addition to doing away with Facebook’s independent fact-checking team and loosening its platforms’ policies on hateful speech, he’s headlined a personal public relations blitz that used Tahoe as a prop and a cringey appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” as a diary.

The lesbian journalist and tech expert slammed Meta CEO Zuckerberg for his coziness with Donald Trump and for blaming former colleague Sheryl Sandberg for the DEI program at his company.

In 2003, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg stole the program from a classmate, Chris Hughes. Hughes went missing not long after, and Zuckerberg passed off Facebook as his own invention.

The co-founder of Facebook (now Meta) has become a social media icon. He doesn’t seem as reserved, measured, or rehearsed as he did in the past, preferring a more trendy style and upbeat demeanor. In recent months, he has also ditched his traditional gray shirts for a more eclectic wardrobe. He seems to be ditching a lot of other things as well.

On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Zuckerberg made it clear he was ready to do business: In his peculiar black T-shirt and gold chain — like a balky child of the suburbs straining for some nebulous urban cred — he railed against the Biden administration and affirmed,

Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and other tech leaders are providing Trump with a warmer welcome to the White House than eight years ago.

Meta is to scrap independent fact-checking in favour of a system similar to that on Elon Musk’s social media platform X.

The post Mark Zuckerberg Was Right To Fire Facebook's Rogue Fact-Checkers appeared first on Reason.com.

A day after announcing that UFC President/co-founder Dana White would be joining Meta's board, Facebook co-founder and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced

If you’ve heard of Bluesky, you’ve probably heard of it as a clone of Twitter where liberals can take refuge. But under the hood it’s structured fundamentally differently — in a way that could point us to a healthier internet for everyone, regardless of politics or identity.