Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896. Homer Adolph Plessy, who was seven-eighths White and one-eighth African American, bought a ...

Plessy v. Ferguson Share ... "The object of the Fourteenth Amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality ... That would not change until 1954, when the Court decided in Brown v.

During oral arguments, Albion W. Tourgée, Plessy’s attorney, told the court that the law was unconstitutional and that it flew in the face of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.

The 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision led to widespread segregation through the establishment of Southern laws and social customs known as “Jim Crow.” ...

In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) ... In a 7-1 ruling, the Court established that the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to enforce racial equality, not to eliminate the distinction based on color.

Was Plessy v. Ferguson the right decision after ... dissented against the court’s narrow interpretation of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment and correctly predicted that the ruling would plant ...

The justices argued that neither the Thirteenth or Fourteenth amendment was violated with Plessy’s arrest. On the Thirteenth amendment issue the Supreme Court ruled: “The Thirteenth Amendment ...

• About 30 years after the 14th Amendment was ratified, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case allowed for "separate but equal" facilities for whites and African ...

NEW ORLEANS — When Homer Plessy, commissioned by the Citizens Committee, refused to move from a white's only railway car to the blacks-only car, he was arrested and convicted of violating the ...

Federal courts acted quickly to render the 14th Amendment a hollow promise, culminating in Plessy v. Ferguson’s 1896 holding that “equal protection” means nothing more than ensuring that ...

Editor's note: This story was written in June of 2018. It took a while for the 14th Amendment to live up to its promise of guaranteeing all Americans equal rights under the law. But, nearly 90 ...