President Trump wants an alternative to the World Health Organization: how should we respond?
Much attention has rightly been placed on how to fill the World Health Organization’s funding gap if and when the US withdraws. Kent Buse and colleagues argue that President Trump’s idea to establish a parallel structure is equally insidious as withdrawing from WHO Some things are much better done together,
More than half of Americans believe the U.S. benefits from its membership in the WHO. As of April 2024, 25% of U.S. adults say the country benefits a great deal from its membership, while about one ...
The World Health Organization is shaped by its members: 194 countries that set health priorities and make agreements about ...
Cases of tuberculosis (TB) are on the rise in England, according to the latest data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA ...
African countries should intensify efforts to eliminate neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) and unlock the productivity and ...
Too few leaders have learned the critical lesson that international cooperation is essential to pandemic prevention, ...
Bird flu has already proven a disaster for humans and animals alike. And it could get far worse.
President Trump’s decision to clean house at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and initially freeze all ...
New research suggests some protein powders contain high levels of toxic metals. We spoke to an expert to find out more about ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback